So let’s get this straight — Caitlin Clark, the record-breaking phenom who just transformed women’s basketball into must-see prime-time television, got snubbed by TIME?

You read that right. TIME Magazine just released one of its most talked-about annual lists — the TIME100, celebrating the most influential people in the world — and somehow, the woman who:

Broke NCAA scoring records

Drew millions of viewers

Became the face of the WNBA before playing a game

Sold out arenas from Iowa to Indiana
…didn’t make the cut.

Instead, TIME spotlighted a few other WNBA stars — great players, sure — but you’re telling us Caitlin Clark isn’t one of the 100 most influential people on the planet right now?

Make it make sense.

Who Made the List Instead?

Among the WNBA names featured were:

A’ja Wilson — A two-time MVP, Finals champ, and defensive monster. Deserved? Totally.

Sabrina Ionescu — Known for her All-Star 3-point shootout and cross-brand marketability. Makes sense.

Angel Reese — Yup, the Bayou Barbie herself made the list too. Her cultural impact is undeniable.

But Caitlin Clark, whose every move is covered, reposted, debated, and celebrated on every sports channel and platform in America?

Crickets.

So… Why The Snub?

Here’s the real question:
Did TIME intentionally avoid adding her to avoid “oversaturation”? Or was it a case of gatekeeping, assuming Clark’s fame hasn’t yet earned longevity?

Let’s be honest — if Clark were in the NBA, she’d be on the cover, in bold letters, probably under a headline like:
“The Future Is Now.”

Instead, the WNBA’s most talked-about rookie got left off a list… that she arguably helped make relevant in the sports world this year.

Influence vs. Accomplishment

Look — no disrespect to the players who made it. A’ja Wilson is a walking highlight reel. Sabrina is building her brand beautifully. Angel Reese is one of the most culturally resonant athletes today.

But influence isn’t just about trophies — it’s about impact.
And right now, no one — and I mean no one — has shifted the landscape of women’s basketball like Caitlin Clark.

ESPN ratings? Skyrocketed.

WNBA ticket sales? Record-breaking.

Merch numbers? Unmatched.

Conversations around women in sports? Clark’s name is leading them.

If that’s not influence, what is?

Fans Are NOT Happy

The backlash online was immediate:

“Caitlin Clark not making TIME100 is actually crazy.”
“So TIME is just ignoring the biggest sports story of 2024?”
“This proves they don’t watch women’s sports unless it fits their narrative.”
“Clark put the WNBA on the map for millions. TIME dropped the ball.”

Final Word: TIME Missed the Moment

This wasn’t just a snub.
It was a missed opportunity to recognize a cultural movement happening in real time.

Caitlin Clark isn’t just another rising athlete. She’s a once-in-a-generation force who’s already reshaped how fans, brands, and broadcasters see women’s basketball.

So here’s a tip, TIME:
Next year, when you’re deciding who’s “influential,” maybe take a look at who’s actually moving the culture.

Because Caitlin Clark didn’t need your list to prove she’s a superstar.
But your list sure needed her.