July 17, 2025 (Investigative Report) – At the height of Sean “Diddy” Combs’s landmark federal trial, rapper and entrepreneur Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson dropped a bombshell: according to him, Combs had allegedly bribed jurors to secure his acquittal on racketeering and sex‑trafficking charges. The claim came amid already stunning courtroom drama—and media fallout.

⚖️ Setting the Scene

From May 5 to July 2, 2025, Combs stood trial at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Prosecutors accused him of running a criminal enterprise for over two decades—culminating in accusations of racketeering, sex trafficking, and bribery-related to coerced “freak-offs” involving drugs and escort services . After deliberations, the jury found him not guilty of racketeering and sex trafficking, but guilty of two lesser Mann Act violations—transporting individuals for prostitution . Sentencing is scheduled for October 3, and meanwhile Combs remains detained

 The Allegation: 50 Cent Speaks Out

In a video posted online, 50 Cent claimed that Combs “bought the jury” to influence the verdict. Public clips—and a separate recording featuring Katt Williams—amplified the scandal: 50 Cent asserted Combs had paid $50 million in bribes to swing the outcome .

This shocking claim coincided with a tense moment in court, where Combs reportedly “lost it,” reacting emotionally—though court footage did not confirm any direct confrontation tied to bribery allegations .

Fact-Check & Legal Realities

No concrete evidence has been brought forward in open court to substantiate bribery claims. Prosecutors never mentioned jury tampering during the RICO or Mann Act proceedings.

The jury employed standard safeguards: anonymous panel, strict sequestration, and extensive instructions; no anomalies have been reported .

A juror later defended the decision, stressing the verdict was based solely on legal parameters and evidence—not intimidation or bias

 Combs’s Courtroom Reaction

Video from July 2 shows Combs dropping to his knees and emotionally raising his fists as the not-guilty verdict was read. Supporters erupted in applause. Immediately after, he remained impassive as the lesser convictions were announced—and his bail was denied on account of violent behavior documented during the trial, including domestic abuse . This emotional volatility may fuel speculation about the bribery allegations, though no links have been drawn beyond the 50 Cent video.

 Why It Matters

Undermining the Verdict – If the bribery claims gain legal traction, the entire verdict could be questioned.

Media & Public Trust – These sensational allegations deepen distrust in celebrity trials—even jurors defended their integrity publicly

Precedent for Other Cases – The mixed outcome and allegations may chill future high-profile sex trafficking prosecutions . What’s Next?

Official review? No known federal investigations into jury tampering have been announced.

Legal fallout? Combs’s defense could cite the 50 Cent allegation to question the verdict’s validity—but only solid evidence would matter in court.

Next Court Date: Combs remains incarcerated ahead of his October 3 sentencing.

 Bottom Line

50 Cent’s claim: No formal evidence yet; remains public accusation.

Court’s stance: Verdict stands; no mention of jury bribery in legal proceedings.

Public response: The jury defended itself; experts and analysts remain skeptical until proof surfaces.