Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg took the witness stand on Monday amid a landmark antitrust trial against the company. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg once floated the idea of wiping users’ Facebook friends to boost the platform’s relevance. The email was revealed as part of the FTC’s landmark antitrust case against Meta. The FTC is seeking to unwind Meta’s acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp, but the company maintains it does not hold a monopoly power in a highly competitive and rapidly evolving digital marketplace.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg took the witness stand on Monday amid a landmark antitrust trial against the company.
Various emails from Zuckerberg’s past communication were introduced as evidence, including one from 2022, when the Meta boss proposed a “crazy” strategy to boost Facebook’s waning cultural relevance: deleting all users’ friend networks.
“Option 1. Double down on Friending,” Zuckerberg wrote in a 2022 message to senior Meta executives. “One potentially crazy idea is to consider wiping everyone’s graphs and having them start again.”
The message, suggested in response to growing concerns about Facebook’s weakening relevance, suggested that the company could revitalize user engagement by eliminating existing friend connections and encouraging users to rebuild their networks from scratch.
The proposal was met with skepticism from some within the company. Tom Alison, the head of Facebook at the time, cautioned that such a move could undermine critical platform functionality, particularly on Instagram.
He responded to the Meta boss, writing, “I’m not sure Option #1 in your proposal (Double-down on Friending) would be viable given my understanding of how vital the friend use case is to IG.”
Zuckerberg pressed the idea further, however, questioning whether a shift from a friend-based model to a follower-based model might be feasible.
Though the proposal was never actually implemented, as Zuckerberg noted in court on Monday, the email reveals how concerned Meta was with remaining competitive in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.
Meta’s antitrust trial
A separate internal email, written by the Meta CEO in 2008, is at the heart of the FTC’s ongoing antitrust case against the platform. In it, he wrote, “It is better to buy than compete.”
The trial, which began Monday, is the result of a years-in-the-making case over Meta’s acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. The FTC’s case alleges the company bought the rival platforms to squash competition and establish an illegal monopoly in the social media market. If Meta loses the case it could be forced to break off Instagram and WhatsApp.
Meta insists that the competitive landscape has shifted dramatically and that it now contends with a host of formidable rivals including TikTok, YouTube, iMessage, and more.
“The evidence at trial will show what every 17-year-old in the world knows: Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp compete with Chinese-owned TikTok, YouTube, X, iMessage and many others. More than 10 years after the FTC reviewed and cleared our acquisitions, the Commission’s action in this case sends the message that no deal is ever truly final. Regulators should be supporting American innovation, rather than seeking to break up a great American company and further advantaging China on critical issues like AI,” the company said in a statement.
Experts say the FTC will face an uphill battle in proving its case, pointing to a recent court filing in which Meta emphasized that the FTC must demonstrate the company holds monopoly power in the current market—not based on conditions from years past. This requirement may be a hurdle for regulators, as the competitive landscape has evolved significantly since Meta acquired WhatsApp and Instagram with new powerful rivals like TikTok gaining ground.
The risks for Meta are still significant, as a forced divestiture of Instagram could slash its advertising revenues by as much as 50%.
Representatives for Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fortune, made outside normal working hours.
News
s – My Husband Left For A 2-Year Job — I Feigned Tears, Took Our $375k Savings and Filed For Divorce!
My Husband Left For A 2-Year Job — I Feigned Tears, Took Our $375k Savings and Filed For Divorce! My…
s – Husband’s MOTHER Left Me Out at a LUXURY Dinner, So I Asked For The OWNER — She Had No Idea that…
Husband’s MOTHER Left Me Out at a LUXURY Dinner, So I Asked For The OWNER — She Had No Idea…
s – My Parents Invited Me To A “Family Celebration,” But When I Arrived, They Told Me There Wasn’t A Seat For Me. My Sister Smirked, “Only Immediate Family Gets A Spot.” I Nodded And Walked Out… The Next Day, They Showed Up At My Door, Begging.
The first thing I saw wasn’t the banner or my sister’s smirk. It was a neat row of white place…
s – I Paid My Parents’ Bills For 5 Years While My Sister Did Nothing. When I Asked Them To Babysit My Daughter For One Night, They Laughed, “We’re Not Your Servants.” So I Cut Them Off. Days Later, They Were Crying Outside My House.
The first thing I noticed through the frosted glass wasn’t my mother’s tears or my father’s grim mouth. It…
s – For My 30th Birthday, I Rented A Lake House, Stocked The Fridge, And Sent Invites Weeks In Advance. No One Came. Two Days Later, My Sister Posted: ‘Family Weekend Vibes!’ — At A Lake Two Hours Away. I Didn’t Say A Word. I Just Stopped Paying Mom’s Mortgage, Dad’s Truck Lease, And The Business Loan They All ‘Forgot’ I Co-Signed. That Night, Mom Texted, ‘Did Something Happen?’ I Replied, ‘Yeah — I Finally Took The Hint.’
The lake was the first thing I noticed when I arrived. Not the house. Not the gate code. Not…
s – My Family Laughed When I Showed Up In A $6 Hoodie To My Sister’s Engagement Party — Her Fiancé Gave Me A Smirk And Said, ‘Did You Uber Here?’ I Just Nodded. The Next Morning, He Showed Up To A Board Meeting… And Saw Me At The Head Of The Table.
The first laugh hit me before I’d even reached the drink table. It floated over the vineyard courtyard in…
End of content
No more pages to load
