BØMBSHELL humiliation in Tesla Cybertruck CRASH | HO

Tesla’s Cybertruck has been making waves for its futuristic design and promises of self-driving innovation, but a recent high-profile crash has sparked controversy and raised serious concerns about the vehicle’s safety and the unwavering loyalty of its fan base. This latest incident has left critics questioning whether Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology is truly road-ready or if it’s turning drivers into unwitting beta testers.

THE TESLA CYBERTRUCK CRASH

The incident in question involved a Tesla Cybertruck crashing into a curb and then a light pole while reportedly using Tesla’s Full Self-Driving software version 13.2.4. The driver, a Tesla enthusiast named Jonathan, took to social media to share details of the accident. However, instead of expressing frustration, he did something that baffled many—he praised Tesla for its safety features, crediting the vehicle for allowing him to walk away unscathed.

Jonathan’s post read:

“So my Tesla Cybertruck crashed into a curb and then a light post on 13.2.4. Thank you, Tesla, for engineering the best passive safety in the world. I walked away without a scratch.”

While Jonathan celebrated surviving the accident, his next comments raised eyebrows. He admitted that Tesla’s FSD had failed to merge out of a lane that was ending, even though there were no vehicles blocking the way. Instead of adjusting, the vehicle made no attempt to slow down or turn—ultimately leading to the crash.

“It failed to merge out of a lane that was ending. There was no one on my left, and it made no attempt to slow down or turn until it had already hit the curb.”

BLIND FAITH IN ELON MUSK?

The contradiction in Jonathan’s statements was glaringly obvious—on one hand, he was thanking Tesla for its safety, and on the other, he was admitting that its self-driving technology failed catastrophically.

For critics of Tesla and Elon Musk, this was yet another example of the so-called Tesla cult mentality, where customers remain fiercely loyal despite glaring flaws in the technology they champion. Many found it ironic that Jonathan was willing to overlook the malfunction of a system designed to prevent accidents just because the vehicle’s crash protection worked.

“DON’T MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE I DID”

Jonathan later added another comment that only fueled the controversy:

“Big fail on my part obviously. Don’t make the same mistake I did—pay attention, it can happen.”

This left people wondering: if Tesla’s FSD requires full attention at all times, can it truly be considered “Full Self-Driving”?

Tesla has long marketed its FSD software as a step toward full autonomy, but the fine print tells a different story—the company advises drivers to keep their hands on the wheel and be ready to take control at any moment. This raises the question: if the software still requires a fully attentive driver, is it truly self-driving at all?

TESLA FANS VS. REALITY

Tesla enthusiasts wasted no time defending the Cybertruck and its technology. Several users in Tesla forums and social media discussions congratulated Jonathan for being part of the beta testing process, as if crashing a car was a necessary sacrifice for the greater good of autonomous driving development.

One fan wrote:

“Glad to hear you’re okay! This is a reminder for all of us to stay vigilant even when using FSD. Tesla’s safety features are amazing, and I’m sure they’d appreciate the footage to improve the system.”

Meanwhile, critics saw this as a glaring example of misplaced loyalty. The fact that Tesla’s customer service was reportedly unresponsive after the crash only made matters worse. Jonathan himself admitted:

“How do I make sure you have the data you need from this incident? Service center has been less than responsive.”

BETA TESTERS ON THE ROAD?

One of the most troubling aspects of this incident is that Tesla owners are essentially acting as unpaid beta testers for a technology that is still incomplete.

Unlike traditional automakers who rigorously test autonomous systems in controlled environments before deploying them to the public,

Tesla’s approach has been to roll out experimental software and let real-world drivers identify problems—sometimes with devastating consequences.

Jonathan’s comments confirmed this when he said:

“I do have the dash cam footage. I want to get it out there as a PSA that it can happen even on version 13.”

This is alarming because it suggests that even the latest version of Tesla’s FSD software—which has supposedly undergone extensive refinements—still fails to recognize fundamental road conditions.

A SYSTEMATIC PROBLEM

The issue with Tesla’s FSD isn’t just about one crash—it’s about the entire system’s reliability. Experts have long argued that Tesla’s refusal to use LiDAR sensors, which most self-driving systems rely on for accurate perception, is a fundamental flaw.

Instead, Tesla relies on cameras and AI, which are more susceptible to failure in poor lighting, complex road conditions, and unexpected obstacles. Critics argue that this approach is a cost-cutting measure that prioritizes profit over safety.

THE POLITICAL ANGLE: TESLA & TRUMP

Another layer to this controversy is Elon Musk’s relationship with Donald Trump, which some speculate is tied to Tesla’s ability to avoid stricter safety regulations. There have been accusations that Tesla has lobbied for relaxed government oversight, allowing them to deploy half-baked autonomous features without facing the same scrutiny as other automakers.

Musk has also made it clear that he dislikes regulatory “bureaucracy” and believes it slows down technological progress. However, critics argue that self-driving cars should not be experimented with in real-world settings where lives are at stake.

THE FUTURE OF TESLA’S SELF-DRIVING AMBITIONS

Despite mounting criticisms and reports of failures, Tesla continues to push forward with its FSD ambitions, often boasting that autonomous driving is just around the corner. However, real-world accidents like this one tell a different story.

If Tesla truly wants to make self-driving cars a reality, experts suggest they need to:

Incorporate LiDAR sensors for more reliable perception.

Stop using real-world drivers as beta testers and conduct safer, more controlled tests.

Improve customer support for those experiencing failures.

Be transparent about the actual limitations of FSD technology.

FINAL THOUGHTS

The Tesla Cybertruck crash is just one of many incidents that highlight the risks and challenges of incomplete self-driving technology. While fans are quick to defend Tesla and its innovations, incidents like these expose the real dangers of over-relying on AI that isn’t fully ready.

Jonathan may have walked away unharmed, but the bigger picture remains troubling—how many more accidents will it take before Tesla acknowledges that its FSD technology isn’t as advanced as it claims?